CP 2045 Draft Comments

Share CP 2045 Draft Comments on Facebook Share CP 2045 Draft Comments on Twitter Share CP 2045 Draft Comments on Linkedin Email CP 2045 Draft Comments link

The community survey for the Comprehensive Plan Update is now closed. We sincerely thank everyone who took the time to share your ideas, experiences, and perspectives. Your input has been invaluable in shaping the draft updated plan, helping to identify key priorities for land use, housing, transportation, water resources, and the unique character of our communities. A summary of survey themes and findings is included in the draft Comprehensive Plan for your review. There are two public hearings for the Comprehensive Plan scheduled. Public comments will be accepted during both.

Public Hearings

Planning and Zoning Commission
Wednesday, February 11, 2026
At or after 4:00 p.m.
Cochise County Board of Supervisors Hearing Room (1415 Melody Lane, Building G, Bisbee, Arizona)

Board of Supervisors
Tuesday, March 10, 2026
At or after 10:00 a.m.
Cochise County Board of Supervisors Hearing Room (1415 Melody Lane, Building G, Bisbee, Arizona)

Review the Draft Plan

The draft Comprehensive Plan is available for public review during regular business hours at the Cochise County Development Services Department.

It is also available under documents “Final Draft Cochise County Comprehensive Plan CP2045.”

You may submit written comments to the Planning and Zoning Commission by Submitting a Public Hearings – Public Comment Form prior to the 2/11/256 meeting: https://www.cochise.az.gov/FormCenter/Development-Services-6/Public-Hearings-Public-Comment-Form-140

You may request to speak at the Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing (2/11, 4pm) by submitting a Development Services Speaker Request form: https://www.cochise.az.gov/FormCenter/Development-Services-6/Development-Services-Speaker-Request-For-151


The community survey for the Comprehensive Plan Update is now closed. We sincerely thank everyone who took the time to share your ideas, experiences, and perspectives. Your input has been invaluable in shaping the draft updated plan, helping to identify key priorities for land use, housing, transportation, water resources, and the unique character of our communities. A summary of survey themes and findings is included in the draft Comprehensive Plan for your review. There are two public hearings for the Comprehensive Plan scheduled. Public comments will be accepted during both.

Public Hearings

Planning and Zoning Commission
Wednesday, February 11, 2026
At or after 4:00 p.m.
Cochise County Board of Supervisors Hearing Room (1415 Melody Lane, Building G, Bisbee, Arizona)

Board of Supervisors
Tuesday, March 10, 2026
At or after 10:00 a.m.
Cochise County Board of Supervisors Hearing Room (1415 Melody Lane, Building G, Bisbee, Arizona)

Review the Draft Plan

The draft Comprehensive Plan is available for public review during regular business hours at the Cochise County Development Services Department.

It is also available under documents “Final Draft Cochise County Comprehensive Plan CP2045.”

You may submit written comments to the Planning and Zoning Commission by Submitting a Public Hearings – Public Comment Form prior to the 2/11/256 meeting: https://www.cochise.az.gov/FormCenter/Development-Services-6/Public-Hearings-Public-Comment-Form-140

You may request to speak at the Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing (2/11, 4pm) by submitting a Development Services Speaker Request form: https://www.cochise.az.gov/FormCenter/Development-Services-6/Development-Services-Speaker-Request-For-151

We want to hear from you. Please share comments that help improve the Draft Cochise County Comprehensive Plan.

Comments may focus on:

  • Plan Direction: Does the draft reflect your community’s priorities for growth, land use, housing, mobility, water, energy, and economic development?
  • Goals & Policies: Are the goals across all elements clear, practical, and relevant? Is anything missing or unclear?
  • Maps & Data: Are growth areas, land use categories, transportation corridors, water features, or other mapped elements accurate?
  • Community Impacts: Will the draft Plan support quality of life—housing options, rural character, agriculture, transportation safety, natural resources, or infrastructure?
  • Specific Corrections: If something appears inaccurate, outdated, or mislabeled, please note the location.
  • Local Knowledge: Share on-the-ground insights about access, flooding, traffic, wells, neighborhood conditions, or other issues not fully captured in the draft.

Tips for Helpful Comments

  • Be as specific as possible—include locations, intersections, parcel areas, or community names.
  • If referring to a map, include the map title or section.
  • Explain why you agree or disagree with something.
  • Keep comments tied to plan content—goals, policies, maps, and community priorities.

How to Comment

  • Type your comment in the text box below, (where it states "Ask a question...")
  • Email comments to developmentservices@cochise.az.gov with the subject line "CP2045 comments."
  • You may also comment directly on each individual element (Land Use, Mobility, Water, Energy, Housing) using the comment boxes provided on those pages.
Email
loader image
Didn't receive confirmation?
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.
  • Share I am totally disappointed with the significant weakening of dark sky protections in the 2045 draft as compared with the current comprehensive plan that was passed in 2015. This is both inappropriate and offensive. Note key differences in the current plan: A standalone goal to "Preserve the dark night skies... to the greatest extend possible" versus subsuming it purely under tourism. This is not merely a tourism issue. We live here, and we want to keep the skies that we have, and ideally IMPROVE them by mitigating unnecessary pollutions. The 2015 plan has multiple specific actionable policies whereas the 2045 draft only has a single policy focused on designations. Protective language has been dropped, e.g. discourage, encourage best practices vs "where feasible" (2045). This is intellectually lazy and favors industrialization and heavy pollution. Lighting standards. Detailed requirements via shielding, low-pressure sodium, timers etc, and NONE of this is mentioned in the 2045 draft. This is a total shift in ideology from enivronmental preservation to "economic tourism opportunity." This is not the vision of residents here and this draft plan is in dire need of revision to restore the protections in the current 2015 plan. I am concerned that the county has a heavy industrialization vision that is not compatible with why most of us live here. Please correct these vast oversights and restore the protections as they were previously defined. on Facebook Share I am totally disappointed with the significant weakening of dark sky protections in the 2045 draft as compared with the current comprehensive plan that was passed in 2015. This is both inappropriate and offensive. Note key differences in the current plan: A standalone goal to "Preserve the dark night skies... to the greatest extend possible" versus subsuming it purely under tourism. This is not merely a tourism issue. We live here, and we want to keep the skies that we have, and ideally IMPROVE them by mitigating unnecessary pollutions. The 2015 plan has multiple specific actionable policies whereas the 2045 draft only has a single policy focused on designations. Protective language has been dropped, e.g. discourage, encourage best practices vs "where feasible" (2045). This is intellectually lazy and favors industrialization and heavy pollution. Lighting standards. Detailed requirements via shielding, low-pressure sodium, timers etc, and NONE of this is mentioned in the 2045 draft. This is a total shift in ideology from enivronmental preservation to "economic tourism opportunity." This is not the vision of residents here and this draft plan is in dire need of revision to restore the protections in the current 2015 plan. I am concerned that the county has a heavy industrialization vision that is not compatible with why most of us live here. Please correct these vast oversights and restore the protections as they were previously defined. on Twitter Share I am totally disappointed with the significant weakening of dark sky protections in the 2045 draft as compared with the current comprehensive plan that was passed in 2015. This is both inappropriate and offensive. Note key differences in the current plan: A standalone goal to "Preserve the dark night skies... to the greatest extend possible" versus subsuming it purely under tourism. This is not merely a tourism issue. We live here, and we want to keep the skies that we have, and ideally IMPROVE them by mitigating unnecessary pollutions. The 2015 plan has multiple specific actionable policies whereas the 2045 draft only has a single policy focused on designations. Protective language has been dropped, e.g. discourage, encourage best practices vs "where feasible" (2045). This is intellectually lazy and favors industrialization and heavy pollution. Lighting standards. Detailed requirements via shielding, low-pressure sodium, timers etc, and NONE of this is mentioned in the 2045 draft. This is a total shift in ideology from enivronmental preservation to "economic tourism opportunity." This is not the vision of residents here and this draft plan is in dire need of revision to restore the protections in the current 2015 plan. I am concerned that the county has a heavy industrialization vision that is not compatible with why most of us live here. Please correct these vast oversights and restore the protections as they were previously defined. on Linkedin Email I am totally disappointed with the significant weakening of dark sky protections in the 2045 draft as compared with the current comprehensive plan that was passed in 2015. This is both inappropriate and offensive. Note key differences in the current plan: A standalone goal to "Preserve the dark night skies... to the greatest extend possible" versus subsuming it purely under tourism. This is not merely a tourism issue. We live here, and we want to keep the skies that we have, and ideally IMPROVE them by mitigating unnecessary pollutions. The 2015 plan has multiple specific actionable policies whereas the 2045 draft only has a single policy focused on designations. Protective language has been dropped, e.g. discourage, encourage best practices vs "where feasible" (2045). This is intellectually lazy and favors industrialization and heavy pollution. Lighting standards. Detailed requirements via shielding, low-pressure sodium, timers etc, and NONE of this is mentioned in the 2045 draft. This is a total shift in ideology from enivronmental preservation to "economic tourism opportunity." This is not the vision of residents here and this draft plan is in dire need of revision to restore the protections in the current 2015 plan. I am concerned that the county has a heavy industrialization vision that is not compatible with why most of us live here. Please correct these vast oversights and restore the protections as they were previously defined. link

    I am totally disappointed with the significant weakening of dark sky protections in the 2045 draft as compared with the current comprehensive plan that was passed in 2015. This is both inappropriate and offensive. Note key differences in the current plan: A standalone goal to "Preserve the dark night skies... to the greatest extend possible" versus subsuming it purely under tourism. This is not merely a tourism issue. We live here, and we want to keep the skies that we have, and ideally IMPROVE them by mitigating unnecessary pollutions. The 2015 plan has multiple specific actionable policies whereas the 2045 draft only has a single policy focused on designations. Protective language has been dropped, e.g. discourage, encourage best practices vs "where feasible" (2045). This is intellectually lazy and favors industrialization and heavy pollution. Lighting standards. Detailed requirements via shielding, low-pressure sodium, timers etc, and NONE of this is mentioned in the 2045 draft. This is a total shift in ideology from enivronmental preservation to "economic tourism opportunity." This is not the vision of residents here and this draft plan is in dire need of revision to restore the protections in the current 2015 plan. I am concerned that the county has a heavy industrialization vision that is not compatible with why most of us live here. Please correct these vast oversights and restore the protections as they were previously defined.

    zac asked about 1 month ago

    Thank you for your comments. Cochise County remains firmly committed to protecting its dark skies. Detailed requirements for shielding, fixture types, timers, and other lighting controls are included in the Outdoor Lighting requirements in the Zoning Regulations (Chapter 2.45)—not the Comprehensive Plan, which sets broader policy direction. CP2045 moves from broad “encourage/discourage” statements of the previous plan to a clear implementation strategy—it directs the County to pursue recognized Dark Sky Community and Dark Sky Park designations, which come with measurable standards, public accountability, and long-term stewardship. It also places dark skies within a broader, coordinated effort to showcase Cochise County’s historic and natural assets, helping align preservation goals with funding opportunities, partnerships, and practical actions that can strengthen protections over time.

  • Share I live in Sunsites/Pearce. I notice no suggested upgrades in the Sulphur Springs Valley. And I could find no indicators for the widening of 191 from Douglas to I-10 on this map, that we were told would be happening in 2026. The information came from a Sheriff's meeting in Sunsites this past summer which included County officials as well. As an aside to the reason for the meeting, we were toldRt 191 would become a 4-lane highway, with turn lanes and turnouts, possibly lights. Also that there would be over 200 semi-trucks passing up rt. 191 daily, maybe more, as an outcome of the upgrading of the Port of Authority in Douglas. My question is twofold: 1. Why have we (residents along the pathway of Rt 191) not been given any say on whether or where that expansion would be taking place. 2. How do those designing this highway expect to build a road that does not immediately collapse into the fissures that are, even now, with much less traffic, continuing to subside every week. ADOT has to send a crew out almost weekly. They fill them one week and they are already collapsing in the next. This seems like a very foolish location for putting a high traffic roadway with very heavy vehicles. I am not particularly fond of the idea, but progress must move on. I just think that a highway in this continually sinking valley is a very risky proposition. We would also like to know the decided upon location for the new highway so that we can move if it is too close to our residences. Thanks you for the planning you are doing. on Facebook Share I live in Sunsites/Pearce. I notice no suggested upgrades in the Sulphur Springs Valley. And I could find no indicators for the widening of 191 from Douglas to I-10 on this map, that we were told would be happening in 2026. The information came from a Sheriff's meeting in Sunsites this past summer which included County officials as well. As an aside to the reason for the meeting, we were toldRt 191 would become a 4-lane highway, with turn lanes and turnouts, possibly lights. Also that there would be over 200 semi-trucks passing up rt. 191 daily, maybe more, as an outcome of the upgrading of the Port of Authority in Douglas. My question is twofold: 1. Why have we (residents along the pathway of Rt 191) not been given any say on whether or where that expansion would be taking place. 2. How do those designing this highway expect to build a road that does not immediately collapse into the fissures that are, even now, with much less traffic, continuing to subside every week. ADOT has to send a crew out almost weekly. They fill them one week and they are already collapsing in the next. This seems like a very foolish location for putting a high traffic roadway with very heavy vehicles. I am not particularly fond of the idea, but progress must move on. I just think that a highway in this continually sinking valley is a very risky proposition. We would also like to know the decided upon location for the new highway so that we can move if it is too close to our residences. Thanks you for the planning you are doing. on Twitter Share I live in Sunsites/Pearce. I notice no suggested upgrades in the Sulphur Springs Valley. And I could find no indicators for the widening of 191 from Douglas to I-10 on this map, that we were told would be happening in 2026. The information came from a Sheriff's meeting in Sunsites this past summer which included County officials as well. As an aside to the reason for the meeting, we were toldRt 191 would become a 4-lane highway, with turn lanes and turnouts, possibly lights. Also that there would be over 200 semi-trucks passing up rt. 191 daily, maybe more, as an outcome of the upgrading of the Port of Authority in Douglas. My question is twofold: 1. Why have we (residents along the pathway of Rt 191) not been given any say on whether or where that expansion would be taking place. 2. How do those designing this highway expect to build a road that does not immediately collapse into the fissures that are, even now, with much less traffic, continuing to subside every week. ADOT has to send a crew out almost weekly. They fill them one week and they are already collapsing in the next. This seems like a very foolish location for putting a high traffic roadway with very heavy vehicles. I am not particularly fond of the idea, but progress must move on. I just think that a highway in this continually sinking valley is a very risky proposition. We would also like to know the decided upon location for the new highway so that we can move if it is too close to our residences. Thanks you for the planning you are doing. on Linkedin Email I live in Sunsites/Pearce. I notice no suggested upgrades in the Sulphur Springs Valley. And I could find no indicators for the widening of 191 from Douglas to I-10 on this map, that we were told would be happening in 2026. The information came from a Sheriff's meeting in Sunsites this past summer which included County officials as well. As an aside to the reason for the meeting, we were toldRt 191 would become a 4-lane highway, with turn lanes and turnouts, possibly lights. Also that there would be over 200 semi-trucks passing up rt. 191 daily, maybe more, as an outcome of the upgrading of the Port of Authority in Douglas. My question is twofold: 1. Why have we (residents along the pathway of Rt 191) not been given any say on whether or where that expansion would be taking place. 2. How do those designing this highway expect to build a road that does not immediately collapse into the fissures that are, even now, with much less traffic, continuing to subside every week. ADOT has to send a crew out almost weekly. They fill them one week and they are already collapsing in the next. This seems like a very foolish location for putting a high traffic roadway with very heavy vehicles. I am not particularly fond of the idea, but progress must move on. I just think that a highway in this continually sinking valley is a very risky proposition. We would also like to know the decided upon location for the new highway so that we can move if it is too close to our residences. Thanks you for the planning you are doing. link

    I live in Sunsites/Pearce. I notice no suggested upgrades in the Sulphur Springs Valley. And I could find no indicators for the widening of 191 from Douglas to I-10 on this map, that we were told would be happening in 2026. The information came from a Sheriff's meeting in Sunsites this past summer which included County officials as well. As an aside to the reason for the meeting, we were toldRt 191 would become a 4-lane highway, with turn lanes and turnouts, possibly lights. Also that there would be over 200 semi-trucks passing up rt. 191 daily, maybe more, as an outcome of the upgrading of the Port of Authority in Douglas. My question is twofold: 1. Why have we (residents along the pathway of Rt 191) not been given any say on whether or where that expansion would be taking place. 2. How do those designing this highway expect to build a road that does not immediately collapse into the fissures that are, even now, with much less traffic, continuing to subside every week. ADOT has to send a crew out almost weekly. They fill them one week and they are already collapsing in the next. This seems like a very foolish location for putting a high traffic roadway with very heavy vehicles. I am not particularly fond of the idea, but progress must move on. I just think that a highway in this continually sinking valley is a very risky proposition. We would also like to know the decided upon location for the new highway so that we can move if it is too close to our residences. Thanks you for the planning you are doing.

    LenaD asked about 2 months ago

    Thank you for the questions. The widening of US 191 is not currently listed as a funded project in ADOT’s adopted 2026–2030 Five-Year Construction Program. US 191 is a state highway, so any expansion will require formal scoping/environmental process where ADOT must present alternatives to the community and take public comment. Regarding fissures and subsidence - any future widening would require extensive geotechnical studies. The location of active subsidence areas will be a major factor in whether, where, and how road improvements could be built. Because the widening of 191 is not a currently funded project, there is no finalized alignment/location available yet that we can share.

  • Share Am I understanding correctly if we live in a platted subdivision that it cannot be open range. How is that enforceable? Who would I contact?? ARIZ SUN SITES #4 lot 4 Blk 626 I also own in the same lot and block lots numbers: 3, 2, 1, 17, 18 on Facebook Share Am I understanding correctly if we live in a platted subdivision that it cannot be open range. How is that enforceable? Who would I contact?? ARIZ SUN SITES #4 lot 4 Blk 626 I also own in the same lot and block lots numbers: 3, 2, 1, 17, 18 on Twitter Share Am I understanding correctly if we live in a platted subdivision that it cannot be open range. How is that enforceable? Who would I contact?? ARIZ SUN SITES #4 lot 4 Blk 626 I also own in the same lot and block lots numbers: 3, 2, 1, 17, 18 on Linkedin Email Am I understanding correctly if we live in a platted subdivision that it cannot be open range. How is that enforceable? Who would I contact?? ARIZ SUN SITES #4 lot 4 Blk 626 I also own in the same lot and block lots numbers: 3, 2, 1, 17, 18 link

    Am I understanding correctly if we live in a platted subdivision that it cannot be open range. How is that enforceable? Who would I contact?? ARIZ SUN SITES #4 lot 4 Blk 626 I also own in the same lot and block lots numbers: 3, 2, 1, 17, 18

    CP2045 asked about 2 months ago

    Sunsites #4 was platted in 1962, before Cochise County adopted subdivision regulations. Fencing is not shown on the plat, as current rules did not apply, and under Arizona open range law, neighboring property owners are generally responsible for fencing livestock out if animals roam onto their property.

  • Share Has or when does this go into effect? on Facebook Share Has or when does this go into effect? on Twitter Share Has or when does this go into effect? on Linkedin Email Has or when does this go into effect? link

    Has or when does this go into effect?

    CP2045 asked about 2 months ago

    Thank you for your question. The plan is currently in the 60-day public review period, which ends January 25, 2026. After that, it will go before the Planning and Zoning Commission on February 11, 2026, for a public hearing and recommendation. Finally, the Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing on February 24, 2026, to consider adoption of the plan. If adopted by the board at that meeting, it would go into immediate effect (Feb 24).

  • Share It all sounds good, but will you stand by it? From what I understand you want Cochise County to be a heavy industrial site. on Facebook Share It all sounds good, but will you stand by it? From what I understand you want Cochise County to be a heavy industrial site. on Twitter Share It all sounds good, but will you stand by it? From what I understand you want Cochise County to be a heavy industrial site. on Linkedin Email It all sounds good, but will you stand by it? From what I understand you want Cochise County to be a heavy industrial site. link

    It all sounds good, but will you stand by it? From what I understand you want Cochise County to be a heavy industrial site.

    Gina asked 2 months ago

    Thank you for your comment. The Comprehensive Plan does not designate Cochise County as a heavy industrial site. Its purpose is to guide land-use decisions, emphasizing the protection of rural character and natural resources. The plan, which applies to unincorporated areas of Cochise County, directs industrial uses appropriate areas with adequate infrastructure.  

  • Share Comment on Draft 2045 Comp. Plan, page 8, historical timeline. Missing entirely is the time period from 1500 through "late 1800s"! These 350-380 YEARS represent the Spanish Colonial times from Coronado and other explorers 1539 on as they traveled the San Pedro R. corridor. The following years continue with the history of these lands claimed for Spain and as a Spanish Colonial outpost (Terrenate Presidio by Fairbank) all the while interacting with the local tribal nations. Cochise County was Colonial Spain, ALL of it from 1539 through 1821 when it became MEXICO. It wasn't until 1854 and the Gadsden Purchase that these formerly Spanish, then Mexican lands became part of the USA as the New Mexico Territory and then Arizona Territory in 1863. This left a rich cultural heritage as well as 350++ years of Spanish being the predominant language along with indigenous dialects and CANNOT BE OVERLOOKED without questions as to why that is the case. Latinos still make up 36% of the County population! Do not overlook or purposely ignore the history, you have access to many experts who can assist you in filling in the details. Please understand , too, that the people didn't move, the BORDER moved. Cochise County was Spain/Mexico many centuries longer than it has been the US. Please add this important part of Arizona and Cochise County history to the timeline! Our history only makes us stronger, and you tout a bilingual population as a good selling point for business--so add WHY there are so many bilingual speakers! (I own ranch property in the County since 1988 and am very familiar with the history of the area, hence my comments on this huge oversight.) Thank you. on Facebook Share Comment on Draft 2045 Comp. Plan, page 8, historical timeline. Missing entirely is the time period from 1500 through "late 1800s"! These 350-380 YEARS represent the Spanish Colonial times from Coronado and other explorers 1539 on as they traveled the San Pedro R. corridor. The following years continue with the history of these lands claimed for Spain and as a Spanish Colonial outpost (Terrenate Presidio by Fairbank) all the while interacting with the local tribal nations. Cochise County was Colonial Spain, ALL of it from 1539 through 1821 when it became MEXICO. It wasn't until 1854 and the Gadsden Purchase that these formerly Spanish, then Mexican lands became part of the USA as the New Mexico Territory and then Arizona Territory in 1863. This left a rich cultural heritage as well as 350++ years of Spanish being the predominant language along with indigenous dialects and CANNOT BE OVERLOOKED without questions as to why that is the case. Latinos still make up 36% of the County population! Do not overlook or purposely ignore the history, you have access to many experts who can assist you in filling in the details. Please understand , too, that the people didn't move, the BORDER moved. Cochise County was Spain/Mexico many centuries longer than it has been the US. Please add this important part of Arizona and Cochise County history to the timeline! Our history only makes us stronger, and you tout a bilingual population as a good selling point for business--so add WHY there are so many bilingual speakers! (I own ranch property in the County since 1988 and am very familiar with the history of the area, hence my comments on this huge oversight.) Thank you. on Twitter Share Comment on Draft 2045 Comp. Plan, page 8, historical timeline. Missing entirely is the time period from 1500 through "late 1800s"! These 350-380 YEARS represent the Spanish Colonial times from Coronado and other explorers 1539 on as they traveled the San Pedro R. corridor. The following years continue with the history of these lands claimed for Spain and as a Spanish Colonial outpost (Terrenate Presidio by Fairbank) all the while interacting with the local tribal nations. Cochise County was Colonial Spain, ALL of it from 1539 through 1821 when it became MEXICO. It wasn't until 1854 and the Gadsden Purchase that these formerly Spanish, then Mexican lands became part of the USA as the New Mexico Territory and then Arizona Territory in 1863. This left a rich cultural heritage as well as 350++ years of Spanish being the predominant language along with indigenous dialects and CANNOT BE OVERLOOKED without questions as to why that is the case. Latinos still make up 36% of the County population! Do not overlook or purposely ignore the history, you have access to many experts who can assist you in filling in the details. Please understand , too, that the people didn't move, the BORDER moved. Cochise County was Spain/Mexico many centuries longer than it has been the US. Please add this important part of Arizona and Cochise County history to the timeline! Our history only makes us stronger, and you tout a bilingual population as a good selling point for business--so add WHY there are so many bilingual speakers! (I own ranch property in the County since 1988 and am very familiar with the history of the area, hence my comments on this huge oversight.) Thank you. on Linkedin Email Comment on Draft 2045 Comp. Plan, page 8, historical timeline. Missing entirely is the time period from 1500 through "late 1800s"! These 350-380 YEARS represent the Spanish Colonial times from Coronado and other explorers 1539 on as they traveled the San Pedro R. corridor. The following years continue with the history of these lands claimed for Spain and as a Spanish Colonial outpost (Terrenate Presidio by Fairbank) all the while interacting with the local tribal nations. Cochise County was Colonial Spain, ALL of it from 1539 through 1821 when it became MEXICO. It wasn't until 1854 and the Gadsden Purchase that these formerly Spanish, then Mexican lands became part of the USA as the New Mexico Territory and then Arizona Territory in 1863. This left a rich cultural heritage as well as 350++ years of Spanish being the predominant language along with indigenous dialects and CANNOT BE OVERLOOKED without questions as to why that is the case. Latinos still make up 36% of the County population! Do not overlook or purposely ignore the history, you have access to many experts who can assist you in filling in the details. Please understand , too, that the people didn't move, the BORDER moved. Cochise County was Spain/Mexico many centuries longer than it has been the US. Please add this important part of Arizona and Cochise County history to the timeline! Our history only makes us stronger, and you tout a bilingual population as a good selling point for business--so add WHY there are so many bilingual speakers! (I own ranch property in the County since 1988 and am very familiar with the history of the area, hence my comments on this huge oversight.) Thank you. link

    Comment on Draft 2045 Comp. Plan, page 8, historical timeline. Missing entirely is the time period from 1500 through "late 1800s"! These 350-380 YEARS represent the Spanish Colonial times from Coronado and other explorers 1539 on as they traveled the San Pedro R. corridor. The following years continue with the history of these lands claimed for Spain and as a Spanish Colonial outpost (Terrenate Presidio by Fairbank) all the while interacting with the local tribal nations. Cochise County was Colonial Spain, ALL of it from 1539 through 1821 when it became MEXICO. It wasn't until 1854 and the Gadsden Purchase that these formerly Spanish, then Mexican lands became part of the USA as the New Mexico Territory and then Arizona Territory in 1863. This left a rich cultural heritage as well as 350++ years of Spanish being the predominant language along with indigenous dialects and CANNOT BE OVERLOOKED without questions as to why that is the case. Latinos still make up 36% of the County population! Do not overlook or purposely ignore the history, you have access to many experts who can assist you in filling in the details. Please understand , too, that the people didn't move, the BORDER moved. Cochise County was Spain/Mexico many centuries longer than it has been the US. Please add this important part of Arizona and Cochise County history to the timeline! Our history only makes us stronger, and you tout a bilingual population as a good selling point for business--so add WHY there are so many bilingual speakers! (I own ranch property in the County since 1988 and am very familiar with the history of the area, hence my comments on this huge oversight.) Thank you.

    mmgraf asked 2 months ago

    Thank you for your comment. You are correct - this is a significant part of Cochise County’s history and cultural heritage. In the final draft, we will revise the historical timeline to include these important periods, highlighting the long-standing presence of Spanish and Indigenous cultures and the bilingual heritage that continues to shape the County today.

  • Share Strict management of livestock from invading and damaging private properties where no legitimate open Grazing is justifiable. Neighborhoods and subdivisions should not have to deal with herds of cattle. This is a safety and health issue, trespassing, esentially claiming eminent domain of tax paying private property owners. on Facebook Share Strict management of livestock from invading and damaging private properties where no legitimate open Grazing is justifiable. Neighborhoods and subdivisions should not have to deal with herds of cattle. This is a safety and health issue, trespassing, esentially claiming eminent domain of tax paying private property owners. on Twitter Share Strict management of livestock from invading and damaging private properties where no legitimate open Grazing is justifiable. Neighborhoods and subdivisions should not have to deal with herds of cattle. This is a safety and health issue, trespassing, esentially claiming eminent domain of tax paying private property owners. on Linkedin Email Strict management of livestock from invading and damaging private properties where no legitimate open Grazing is justifiable. Neighborhoods and subdivisions should not have to deal with herds of cattle. This is a safety and health issue, trespassing, esentially claiming eminent domain of tax paying private property owners. link

    Strict management of livestock from invading and damaging private properties where no legitimate open Grazing is justifiable. Neighborhoods and subdivisions should not have to deal with herds of cattle. This is a safety and health issue, trespassing, esentially claiming eminent domain of tax paying private property owners.

    Cas asked 2 months ago

    Thank you for your comment and for sharing your concerns. In platted subdivisions, Cochise County requires fencing or other measures to keep livestock out of residential areas, helping protect safety, health, and property. On unplatted rural lands, Arizona’s open-range laws generally allow livestock to roam. Property owners can contact state legislators to advocate for changes to these laws to better protect their property. 

  • Share Cochise county is and should stay Rural. Think basics. Water: Every decision should out this first and foremost. Follow and update the 100 year plan. Protect us from industries moving in and using the recourse that we need to survive. Heavy Industry: We do not have the infostructure and should not attempt to create it for Heavy Industry. I cannot think of a heavy industry that protects the environment or recourses. To blindly support a polluting industry like ADI in Benson is in my opinion a way to kill the town, Few jobs created, massive pollutants and water use, no infrastructure to fight an accident. IT will drive away snowbirds and tourists coming to Cochise country because of the rural aspect of our country. Secondary routes. With no frontage road we all know what happens when I-10 gets closed down. Look at accidents or construction on the highway. I 10 has become a major trucking route with no expansion. or consideration of secondary routing. Protect what we have. How can a county allow a secondary smelter next to out rive and wildlife area? It is coming to light that it appears Cochise county has looked the other way for years when the tank transfer area of the railroad in Benson has no plan should an accident happen. A volunteer fore department. The emergency plan drafted by ADI says they will call 911. No evacuation plan. I feel that the powers of government has decided that sacrificing the people for profit is acceptable. Think Rural. Think conservation. Think what we are leaving to our children and grandchildren. ADI is the canary in the mine shaft. IF it takes place, watch the snowbirds leave. Watch businesses close. Watch the increased traffic and pollution drive out the small farmers, Watch the water dry up. Thanks for listening. Christopher on Facebook Share Cochise county is and should stay Rural. Think basics. Water: Every decision should out this first and foremost. Follow and update the 100 year plan. Protect us from industries moving in and using the recourse that we need to survive. Heavy Industry: We do not have the infostructure and should not attempt to create it for Heavy Industry. I cannot think of a heavy industry that protects the environment or recourses. To blindly support a polluting industry like ADI in Benson is in my opinion a way to kill the town, Few jobs created, massive pollutants and water use, no infrastructure to fight an accident. IT will drive away snowbirds and tourists coming to Cochise country because of the rural aspect of our country. Secondary routes. With no frontage road we all know what happens when I-10 gets closed down. Look at accidents or construction on the highway. I 10 has become a major trucking route with no expansion. or consideration of secondary routing. Protect what we have. How can a county allow a secondary smelter next to out rive and wildlife area? It is coming to light that it appears Cochise county has looked the other way for years when the tank transfer area of the railroad in Benson has no plan should an accident happen. A volunteer fore department. The emergency plan drafted by ADI says they will call 911. No evacuation plan. I feel that the powers of government has decided that sacrificing the people for profit is acceptable. Think Rural. Think conservation. Think what we are leaving to our children and grandchildren. ADI is the canary in the mine shaft. IF it takes place, watch the snowbirds leave. Watch businesses close. Watch the increased traffic and pollution drive out the small farmers, Watch the water dry up. Thanks for listening. Christopher on Twitter Share Cochise county is and should stay Rural. Think basics. Water: Every decision should out this first and foremost. Follow and update the 100 year plan. Protect us from industries moving in and using the recourse that we need to survive. Heavy Industry: We do not have the infostructure and should not attempt to create it for Heavy Industry. I cannot think of a heavy industry that protects the environment or recourses. To blindly support a polluting industry like ADI in Benson is in my opinion a way to kill the town, Few jobs created, massive pollutants and water use, no infrastructure to fight an accident. IT will drive away snowbirds and tourists coming to Cochise country because of the rural aspect of our country. Secondary routes. With no frontage road we all know what happens when I-10 gets closed down. Look at accidents or construction on the highway. I 10 has become a major trucking route with no expansion. or consideration of secondary routing. Protect what we have. How can a county allow a secondary smelter next to out rive and wildlife area? It is coming to light that it appears Cochise county has looked the other way for years when the tank transfer area of the railroad in Benson has no plan should an accident happen. A volunteer fore department. The emergency plan drafted by ADI says they will call 911. No evacuation plan. I feel that the powers of government has decided that sacrificing the people for profit is acceptable. Think Rural. Think conservation. Think what we are leaving to our children and grandchildren. ADI is the canary in the mine shaft. IF it takes place, watch the snowbirds leave. Watch businesses close. Watch the increased traffic and pollution drive out the small farmers, Watch the water dry up. Thanks for listening. Christopher on Linkedin Email Cochise county is and should stay Rural. Think basics. Water: Every decision should out this first and foremost. Follow and update the 100 year plan. Protect us from industries moving in and using the recourse that we need to survive. Heavy Industry: We do not have the infostructure and should not attempt to create it for Heavy Industry. I cannot think of a heavy industry that protects the environment or recourses. To blindly support a polluting industry like ADI in Benson is in my opinion a way to kill the town, Few jobs created, massive pollutants and water use, no infrastructure to fight an accident. IT will drive away snowbirds and tourists coming to Cochise country because of the rural aspect of our country. Secondary routes. With no frontage road we all know what happens when I-10 gets closed down. Look at accidents or construction on the highway. I 10 has become a major trucking route with no expansion. or consideration of secondary routing. Protect what we have. How can a county allow a secondary smelter next to out rive and wildlife area? It is coming to light that it appears Cochise county has looked the other way for years when the tank transfer area of the railroad in Benson has no plan should an accident happen. A volunteer fore department. The emergency plan drafted by ADI says they will call 911. No evacuation plan. I feel that the powers of government has decided that sacrificing the people for profit is acceptable. Think Rural. Think conservation. Think what we are leaving to our children and grandchildren. ADI is the canary in the mine shaft. IF it takes place, watch the snowbirds leave. Watch businesses close. Watch the increased traffic and pollution drive out the small farmers, Watch the water dry up. Thanks for listening. Christopher link

    Cochise county is and should stay Rural. Think basics. Water: Every decision should out this first and foremost. Follow and update the 100 year plan. Protect us from industries moving in and using the recourse that we need to survive. Heavy Industry: We do not have the infostructure and should not attempt to create it for Heavy Industry. I cannot think of a heavy industry that protects the environment or recourses. To blindly support a polluting industry like ADI in Benson is in my opinion a way to kill the town, Few jobs created, massive pollutants and water use, no infrastructure to fight an accident. IT will drive away snowbirds and tourists coming to Cochise country because of the rural aspect of our country. Secondary routes. With no frontage road we all know what happens when I-10 gets closed down. Look at accidents or construction on the highway. I 10 has become a major trucking route with no expansion. or consideration of secondary routing. Protect what we have. How can a county allow a secondary smelter next to out rive and wildlife area? It is coming to light that it appears Cochise county has looked the other way for years when the tank transfer area of the railroad in Benson has no plan should an accident happen. A volunteer fore department. The emergency plan drafted by ADI says they will call 911. No evacuation plan. I feel that the powers of government has decided that sacrificing the people for profit is acceptable. Think Rural. Think conservation. Think what we are leaving to our children and grandchildren. ADI is the canary in the mine shaft. IF it takes place, watch the snowbirds leave. Watch businesses close. Watch the increased traffic and pollution drive out the small farmers, Watch the water dry up. Thanks for listening. Christopher

    Christopher Dezso asked 2 months ago

    Thank you for your comments. The Comprehensive Plan emphasizes preserving Cochise County’s rural character and requires that land-use decisions, particularly in cases where there is a request to change the land use or zoning from rural to industrial, prioritize water availability, infrastructure capacity, transportation access, emergency services, and compatibility with surrounding uses before changes are considered. The County recognizes your concerns and will use this Plan to guide growth in a manner that protects public safety, environmental resources, tourism, and the long-term viability of rural communities.

  • Share Many of us in the Sulphur Springs Valley have lived here for decades. We have had to deepen our well, even though it was one of the deeper ones when we purchased the property. ( because it was at one time used for agriculture.) It costs thousands of dollars to deepen a well. We are worried that our well may dry up and we or our children won't be able to sell our property. We are surrounded by land owned by the dairies and they are running those pivots constantly. Also, they recently moved a large herd of cattle onto the field behind our house. All of our neighbors have the same concerns. on Facebook Share Many of us in the Sulphur Springs Valley have lived here for decades. We have had to deepen our well, even though it was one of the deeper ones when we purchased the property. ( because it was at one time used for agriculture.) It costs thousands of dollars to deepen a well. We are worried that our well may dry up and we or our children won't be able to sell our property. We are surrounded by land owned by the dairies and they are running those pivots constantly. Also, they recently moved a large herd of cattle onto the field behind our house. All of our neighbors have the same concerns. on Twitter Share Many of us in the Sulphur Springs Valley have lived here for decades. We have had to deepen our well, even though it was one of the deeper ones when we purchased the property. ( because it was at one time used for agriculture.) It costs thousands of dollars to deepen a well. We are worried that our well may dry up and we or our children won't be able to sell our property. We are surrounded by land owned by the dairies and they are running those pivots constantly. Also, they recently moved a large herd of cattle onto the field behind our house. All of our neighbors have the same concerns. on Linkedin Email Many of us in the Sulphur Springs Valley have lived here for decades. We have had to deepen our well, even though it was one of the deeper ones when we purchased the property. ( because it was at one time used for agriculture.) It costs thousands of dollars to deepen a well. We are worried that our well may dry up and we or our children won't be able to sell our property. We are surrounded by land owned by the dairies and they are running those pivots constantly. Also, they recently moved a large herd of cattle onto the field behind our house. All of our neighbors have the same concerns. link

    Many of us in the Sulphur Springs Valley have lived here for decades. We have had to deepen our well, even though it was one of the deeper ones when we purchased the property. ( because it was at one time used for agriculture.) It costs thousands of dollars to deepen a well. We are worried that our well may dry up and we or our children won't be able to sell our property. We are surrounded by land owned by the dairies and they are running those pivots constantly. Also, they recently moved a large herd of cattle onto the field behind our house. All of our neighbors have the same concerns.

    L.Polm asked 2 months ago

    Thank you for your comments. While groundwater regulation and agricultural pumping are primarily overseen by the State of Arizona, the County can address these concerns through land-use planning by requiring water supply considerations for new (non-exempt) development and coordinating with state agencies on long-term groundwater sustainability. These issues are critical to protecting the viability of existing rural residences, which is a priority of this planning document.

  • Share Programs that help owner/builders with cost of developing their land. on Facebook Share Programs that help owner/builders with cost of developing their land. on Twitter Share Programs that help owner/builders with cost of developing their land. on Linkedin Email Programs that help owner/builders with cost of developing their land. link

    Programs that help owner/builders with cost of developing their land.

    Kalimera asked 12 months ago

    Thanks for the suggestion!

Page last updated: 04 Feb 2026, 12:31 PM