CP 2045 Water Resources

Share CP 2045 Water Resources on Facebook Share CP 2045 Water Resources on Twitter Share CP 2045 Water Resources on Linkedin Email CP 2045 Water Resources link

The Water Resource Element provides a framework for managing Cochise County’s water resources, ensuring sustainable use, protecting quality, and supporting long-term reliability. It focuses on water supply, conservation, aquifer recharge, and planning for future demand to provide safe, reliable water for residents, agriculture, industry, and ecosystems. Key challenges include reliance on groundwater, declining aquifers in some areas, limited surface water, irrigation competition, and pressures from growth and environmental changes.

Existing Water Resources

  • Groundwater: Primary water source (≈99.7% of total use). Major aquifers include Upper San Pedro Basin and Sulphur Springs Valley Basin. Some areas have declining levels due to withdrawals exceeding recharge.
  • Surface Water: Includes San Pedro River, Parker Canyon Lake, Willcox Playa, Whitewater Draw, and small streams/reservoirs.
  • Effluent / Reclaimed Water: Treated municipal wastewater reused for irrigation, industrial purposes, and aquifer recharge. Extends supplies and reduces pressure on groundwater.
  • Irrigation Districts: Local entities (e.g., St. David, Pistachio Pass) manage water delivery and infrastructure for agriculture and municipalities.
  • Private Wells & Water Systems: Over 23,000 registered wells; supplemented by municipal systems, public improvement districts, private water companies, and other regulated systems to ensure safe drinking water.

Water Demand and Supply

  • Current Use: 92% for agriculture; 8% municipal and commercial.
  • Future Demand: Minimal population growth expected over 10 years, but incremental increases in residential, commercial, agricultural, and industrial water use require careful planning.
  • Adequacy Requirements: County follows ARS 11-806.01; new subdivisions must have legally and physically available water via ADWR or designated providers (Benson, Douglas, Willcox, Pueblo del Sol Water Company).
  • Management Programs: Collaborative initiatives like CCRN and Sierra Vista Sub-Watershed Plan support sustainable use, recharge, and coordination among municipalities, districts, and providers.

Federal, State, & Local Programs

  • ADWR: Maintains data on water availability, well registry, and regulatory oversight.
  • CCRN: Implements recharge and conservation projects, including stormwater capture and effluent reuse.
  • Irrigation Districts: Legally recognized entities managing water delivery and infrastructure in coordination with County planning.
  • Municipal & Private Providers: Deliver safe, reliable water to communities, meeting ADEQ standards.


PROPOSED WATER RESOURCE GOALS & POLICIES

GOAL 1: Keep the Water Flowing – Reliable Water for All

  • Coordinate with ADWR, municipalities, irrigation districts, water districts, community systems, and private providers.
  • Share data and plan collaboratively to identify and optimize water sources.
  • Invest in stormwater capture, effluent reuse, gabions, and delivery improvements.
  • Incorporate water availability into County infrastructure planning.
  • Evaluate new sources: bi-national desalination, inter-basin transfers, advanced reuse.

GOAL 2: Pure and Protected – Safeguarding Water Quality

  • Implement best management practices: monitoring, runoff control, treatment, operator guidance.
  • Partner with public, private, and nonprofit organizations to reduce pollution.
  • Include water quality in public infrastructure projects with water systems.

GOAL 3: Use it Wisely – Water Conservation

  • Promote conservation measures for residents, businesses, and agriculture.
  • Encourage water-efficient technologies: irrigation systems, low-flow fixtures, xeriscaping.
  • Support reuse of treated effluent for irrigation, industrial uses, and recharge.

GOAL 4: Recharge and Restore – Protecting Aquifers and Watersheds

  • Implement aquifer recharge projects: stormwater capture, effluent infiltration.
  • Protect riparian corridors, playas, and natural recharge areas.
  • Coordinate with state and federal agencies for watershed-scale planning.

GOAL 5: Plan Ahead for Water

  • Evaluate drought, extreme weather, and environmental impacts; plan adaptive strategies.
  • Develop emergency water supply plans for communities and critical infrastructure.
  • Promote flexible policies to meet changing water demands and regulations.
  • Integrate emerging water supply strategies into long-term planning for resilience.

The Water Resource Element provides a framework for managing Cochise County’s water resources, ensuring sustainable use, protecting quality, and supporting long-term reliability. It focuses on water supply, conservation, aquifer recharge, and planning for future demand to provide safe, reliable water for residents, agriculture, industry, and ecosystems. Key challenges include reliance on groundwater, declining aquifers in some areas, limited surface water, irrigation competition, and pressures from growth and environmental changes.

Existing Water Resources

  • Groundwater: Primary water source (≈99.7% of total use). Major aquifers include Upper San Pedro Basin and Sulphur Springs Valley Basin. Some areas have declining levels due to withdrawals exceeding recharge.
  • Surface Water: Includes San Pedro River, Parker Canyon Lake, Willcox Playa, Whitewater Draw, and small streams/reservoirs.
  • Effluent / Reclaimed Water: Treated municipal wastewater reused for irrigation, industrial purposes, and aquifer recharge. Extends supplies and reduces pressure on groundwater.
  • Irrigation Districts: Local entities (e.g., St. David, Pistachio Pass) manage water delivery and infrastructure for agriculture and municipalities.
  • Private Wells & Water Systems: Over 23,000 registered wells; supplemented by municipal systems, public improvement districts, private water companies, and other regulated systems to ensure safe drinking water.

Water Demand and Supply

  • Current Use: 92% for agriculture; 8% municipal and commercial.
  • Future Demand: Minimal population growth expected over 10 years, but incremental increases in residential, commercial, agricultural, and industrial water use require careful planning.
  • Adequacy Requirements: County follows ARS 11-806.01; new subdivisions must have legally and physically available water via ADWR or designated providers (Benson, Douglas, Willcox, Pueblo del Sol Water Company).
  • Management Programs: Collaborative initiatives like CCRN and Sierra Vista Sub-Watershed Plan support sustainable use, recharge, and coordination among municipalities, districts, and providers.

Federal, State, & Local Programs

  • ADWR: Maintains data on water availability, well registry, and regulatory oversight.
  • CCRN: Implements recharge and conservation projects, including stormwater capture and effluent reuse.
  • Irrigation Districts: Legally recognized entities managing water delivery and infrastructure in coordination with County planning.
  • Municipal & Private Providers: Deliver safe, reliable water to communities, meeting ADEQ standards.


PROPOSED WATER RESOURCE GOALS & POLICIES

GOAL 1: Keep the Water Flowing – Reliable Water for All

  • Coordinate with ADWR, municipalities, irrigation districts, water districts, community systems, and private providers.
  • Share data and plan collaboratively to identify and optimize water sources.
  • Invest in stormwater capture, effluent reuse, gabions, and delivery improvements.
  • Incorporate water availability into County infrastructure planning.
  • Evaluate new sources: bi-national desalination, inter-basin transfers, advanced reuse.

GOAL 2: Pure and Protected – Safeguarding Water Quality

  • Implement best management practices: monitoring, runoff control, treatment, operator guidance.
  • Partner with public, private, and nonprofit organizations to reduce pollution.
  • Include water quality in public infrastructure projects with water systems.

GOAL 3: Use it Wisely – Water Conservation

  • Promote conservation measures for residents, businesses, and agriculture.
  • Encourage water-efficient technologies: irrigation systems, low-flow fixtures, xeriscaping.
  • Support reuse of treated effluent for irrigation, industrial uses, and recharge.

GOAL 4: Recharge and Restore – Protecting Aquifers and Watersheds

  • Implement aquifer recharge projects: stormwater capture, effluent infiltration.
  • Protect riparian corridors, playas, and natural recharge areas.
  • Coordinate with state and federal agencies for watershed-scale planning.

GOAL 5: Plan Ahead for Water

  • Evaluate drought, extreme weather, and environmental impacts; plan adaptive strategies.
  • Develop emergency water supply plans for communities and critical infrastructure.
  • Promote flexible policies to meet changing water demands and regulations.
  • Integrate emerging water supply strategies into long-term planning for resilience.

We Want to Hear From You. Please share comments to help improve the draft Water Resource Element.

Comments should focus on:

  • Water Supply Areas: Are the boundaries and designations accurate? Do they reflect where water sources, infrastructure, and services exist?
  • Water Resource Map: Are the water use categories and locations correct for your community?
  • Goals & Policies: Are the five water resource goals clear and appropriate? Is anything missing or unclear?
  • Community Impacts: Will the proposed water policies support your community’s needs—residential, agricultural, industrial, and environmental water uses?
  • Specific Corrections: If a boundary, label, or map feature looks incorrect, please tell us where.
  • Local Knowledge: Share on-the-ground insights about water access, flooding, recharge areas, quality concerns, or unique watershed characteristics.

Tips for Helpful Comments

  • Be as specific as possible—note locations, streams, aquifers, wells, or water infrastructure.
  • If referring to a map, include the map section or area name.
  • Share why you support or disagree with a policy or designation.
  • Keep comments focused on water supply, conservation, quality, and planning.

How to comment:

Note: Your comments help ensure the Water Resource Element reflects our community priorities. Thank you!


loader image
Forgot password?
Didn't receive confirmation?
Register Now
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.
  • Share By the way, for many years to come Arizonans cannot count on ANY federal support in the water management area. It is a "state" responsibility, other than for Constitutionally approved matters related to regional hydro-electric power, dams, and flowing rivers. "Recharging" our water zones is the responsibility of Arizonans and no other. In short, I ain't payin' for California's or Colorado's failure to manage their water resources efficiently or in a sustainable manner. on Facebook Share By the way, for many years to come Arizonans cannot count on ANY federal support in the water management area. It is a "state" responsibility, other than for Constitutionally approved matters related to regional hydro-electric power, dams, and flowing rivers. "Recharging" our water zones is the responsibility of Arizonans and no other. In short, I ain't payin' for California's or Colorado's failure to manage their water resources efficiently or in a sustainable manner. on Twitter Share By the way, for many years to come Arizonans cannot count on ANY federal support in the water management area. It is a "state" responsibility, other than for Constitutionally approved matters related to regional hydro-electric power, dams, and flowing rivers. "Recharging" our water zones is the responsibility of Arizonans and no other. In short, I ain't payin' for California's or Colorado's failure to manage their water resources efficiently or in a sustainable manner. on Linkedin Email By the way, for many years to come Arizonans cannot count on ANY federal support in the water management area. It is a "state" responsibility, other than for Constitutionally approved matters related to regional hydro-electric power, dams, and flowing rivers. "Recharging" our water zones is the responsibility of Arizonans and no other. In short, I ain't payin' for California's or Colorado's failure to manage their water resources efficiently or in a sustainable manner. link

    By the way, for many years to come Arizonans cannot count on ANY federal support in the water management area. It is a "state" responsibility, other than for Constitutionally approved matters related to regional hydro-electric power, dams, and flowing rivers. "Recharging" our water zones is the responsibility of Arizonans and no other. In short, I ain't payin' for California's or Colorado's failure to manage their water resources efficiently or in a sustainable manner.

    Vic Currier asked 11 months ago

    Thank you for your comment. The Water Resource Element reflects that water management—including recharge, conservation, and long-term planning—is primarily a local and state responsibility. The plan focuses on sustainable use, aquifer protection, and community-based solutions, without relying on federal support. 

  • Share What is happening within the Douglas aquifer on Facebook Share What is happening within the Douglas aquifer on Twitter Share What is happening within the Douglas aquifer on Linkedin Email What is happening within the Douglas aquifer link

    What is happening within the Douglas aquifer

    Jeanne asked 10 months ago

    Thank you for your questions. The area is now regulated as the Douglas Active Management Area, which requires conservation measures.The first plan was adopted in late 2024. It establishes rules to reduce groundwater withdrawals, manage irrigation and municipal use, and move the aquifer toward long-term sustainability. 

  • Share why have you not implemented the suggestions that J. Nayer Hardin made? There is no time to waste given the problems that are fast arising and that will not wait for creeping government to support? on Facebook Share why have you not implemented the suggestions that J. Nayer Hardin made? There is no time to waste given the problems that are fast arising and that will not wait for creeping government to support? on Twitter Share why have you not implemented the suggestions that J. Nayer Hardin made? There is no time to waste given the problems that are fast arising and that will not wait for creeping government to support? on Linkedin Email why have you not implemented the suggestions that J. Nayer Hardin made? There is no time to waste given the problems that are fast arising and that will not wait for creeping government to support? link

    why have you not implemented the suggestions that J. Nayer Hardin made? There is no time to waste given the problems that are fast arising and that will not wait for creeping government to support?

    alohawater asked 10 months ago

    Thank you for your comment. All public suggestions, including those from J. Nayer Hardin, are being reviewed as part of the Comprehensive Plan update process. Because the plan must follow required public-input steps, legal guidelines, and coordination with state and local water agencies, recommendations cannot be adopted immediately, but we appreciate your time and note your concern. 

  • Share Please consider implementing incentives for home owners to install water harvesting for garden/yard watering. on Facebook Share Please consider implementing incentives for home owners to install water harvesting for garden/yard watering. on Twitter Share Please consider implementing incentives for home owners to install water harvesting for garden/yard watering. on Linkedin Email Please consider implementing incentives for home owners to install water harvesting for garden/yard watering. link

    Please consider implementing incentives for home owners to install water harvesting for garden/yard watering.

    CRR asked 10 months ago

    Thank you for your suggestion. Incentives for residential rainwater harvesting align strongly with the Element’s conservation and recharge goals. Your feedback is noted as we review potential policy tools—such as rebates, technical guidance, or partnerships—that can help homeowners implement water-saving practices.

  • Share Is the County considering the rights and needs of many over the rights and needs of the few? I believe our elected officials should be voting for what is good for many and not just the needs of a few. Specifically, I reference the small cattle owners and crop growers as opposed to the large stock holder owned, do not care about your neighbor, do not provide any value to the community farmers and cattle owners. These water restrictions loom heavy on the minds of those just trying to feed their family and the large conglomerates do not worry as they have the lawyers and come elected officials on their side. Farmer suicide rates exceed that of Veterans. The transition to organic farming, mob cattle grazing, This can save water, get the land healthier so water can soak faster into the aquifer. Get rid of all these water sucking non native plants in particular mesquites that are not native to some areas of the county. Perhaps the county should look at getting specialists to come here to teach these things instead of focusing on just getting more tourists to come in damage the area, drive side by side vehicles spreading invasive seeds in their tires, eroding the lands causing more runoff and disrupting the peace and quiet of the area. on Facebook Share Is the County considering the rights and needs of many over the rights and needs of the few? I believe our elected officials should be voting for what is good for many and not just the needs of a few. Specifically, I reference the small cattle owners and crop growers as opposed to the large stock holder owned, do not care about your neighbor, do not provide any value to the community farmers and cattle owners. These water restrictions loom heavy on the minds of those just trying to feed their family and the large conglomerates do not worry as they have the lawyers and come elected officials on their side. Farmer suicide rates exceed that of Veterans. The transition to organic farming, mob cattle grazing, This can save water, get the land healthier so water can soak faster into the aquifer. Get rid of all these water sucking non native plants in particular mesquites that are not native to some areas of the county. Perhaps the county should look at getting specialists to come here to teach these things instead of focusing on just getting more tourists to come in damage the area, drive side by side vehicles spreading invasive seeds in their tires, eroding the lands causing more runoff and disrupting the peace and quiet of the area. on Twitter Share Is the County considering the rights and needs of many over the rights and needs of the few? I believe our elected officials should be voting for what is good for many and not just the needs of a few. Specifically, I reference the small cattle owners and crop growers as opposed to the large stock holder owned, do not care about your neighbor, do not provide any value to the community farmers and cattle owners. These water restrictions loom heavy on the minds of those just trying to feed their family and the large conglomerates do not worry as they have the lawyers and come elected officials on their side. Farmer suicide rates exceed that of Veterans. The transition to organic farming, mob cattle grazing, This can save water, get the land healthier so water can soak faster into the aquifer. Get rid of all these water sucking non native plants in particular mesquites that are not native to some areas of the county. Perhaps the county should look at getting specialists to come here to teach these things instead of focusing on just getting more tourists to come in damage the area, drive side by side vehicles spreading invasive seeds in their tires, eroding the lands causing more runoff and disrupting the peace and quiet of the area. on Linkedin Email Is the County considering the rights and needs of many over the rights and needs of the few? I believe our elected officials should be voting for what is good for many and not just the needs of a few. Specifically, I reference the small cattle owners and crop growers as opposed to the large stock holder owned, do not care about your neighbor, do not provide any value to the community farmers and cattle owners. These water restrictions loom heavy on the minds of those just trying to feed their family and the large conglomerates do not worry as they have the lawyers and come elected officials on their side. Farmer suicide rates exceed that of Veterans. The transition to organic farming, mob cattle grazing, This can save water, get the land healthier so water can soak faster into the aquifer. Get rid of all these water sucking non native plants in particular mesquites that are not native to some areas of the county. Perhaps the county should look at getting specialists to come here to teach these things instead of focusing on just getting more tourists to come in damage the area, drive side by side vehicles spreading invasive seeds in their tires, eroding the lands causing more runoff and disrupting the peace and quiet of the area. link

    Is the County considering the rights and needs of many over the rights and needs of the few? I believe our elected officials should be voting for what is good for many and not just the needs of a few. Specifically, I reference the small cattle owners and crop growers as opposed to the large stock holder owned, do not care about your neighbor, do not provide any value to the community farmers and cattle owners. These water restrictions loom heavy on the minds of those just trying to feed their family and the large conglomerates do not worry as they have the lawyers and come elected officials on their side. Farmer suicide rates exceed that of Veterans. The transition to organic farming, mob cattle grazing, This can save water, get the land healthier so water can soak faster into the aquifer. Get rid of all these water sucking non native plants in particular mesquites that are not native to some areas of the county. Perhaps the county should look at getting specialists to come here to teach these things instead of focusing on just getting more tourists to come in damage the area, drive side by side vehicles spreading invasive seeds in their tires, eroding the lands causing more runoff and disrupting the peace and quiet of the area.

    Better Future asked 4 months ago

    Thank you for your comments. The Water Resource Element aims to balance the needs of all water users, and your concerns about the challenges faced by small farmers and the impacts of large operations are important. While this element cannot regulate water rights or individual operations, your feedback helps ensure the plan better reflects on-the-ground realities and community priorities. Thank you for contributing. 

  • Share Comment--We should look at all resources for self-sustainment inside the borders of Arizona without consideration for neighboring states or countries. - Arizona Water Law (AWL) and the follow-on promulgated rules & regulations require, first, an element of consistency throughout the Territory of Arizona. - Second, AWL - said (by water masters) to be the most "incongruous collection of special interest paragraphs" in Arizona Law - should require that "no man can be deprived of drinking water" with stiff penalties for violation. - After that, no person or entity upstream can dam or block water from downstream needs (water shed management regulation needed). - All promulgated rules & regulations regarding water use and distribution should be managed according to guidelines within the "USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map - U.S. Department of Agriculture" (GZ) designations. The northern parts of the territory are in GZ-6 and GZ-7. The southern part is predominately in GZ-8. - From that point, food is the next most important priority behind water. What edible foods are grown in GZ-6 & 7? What edible foods are grown in GZ-8? What edible foods need the most water on a "per-acre" calculation for (a) human and (b) animal nutritional benefits? Flora pollinators & cross-pollinators for sustaining life and abundant growth must necessarily be managed - not on men's whims - but on science's calculated facts. Animal breeds are essential factors in food production. For example - the Jornada Experimental Range northeast of Las Cruces (Growing Zone "8") established in 1912, found in general terms, that the Brangus breed of cattle is far more efficient than, say, Herefords or pure Brahman herds on a grazing site monitored over a sixty (60) year period by "cow-unit-per-acre" and "carcass size" suitable for majority slaughterhouse meat processors. Based upon sufficient study, water-use law should be measured by "best conservation" and "highest quality need." - Water use is not a sport. - Consider switching back to the "community swimming pool" rather than have individual pools of water evaporating at accelerated rates. It's the same for unnecessary personal fish ponds. Neither is in the community's best interest until all other basic needs herein are satisfied. Then, if enough water is deemed available, by all means, fill up your personal swimming pool if you must. In arid lands, WATER must take top priority over all other matters except border security and community safety, followed by the general health and welfare of citizens within the territory. Until other laws related to, for example, eating horse meat are changed, horses contribute little or nothing other than for use in antiquated farming/plowing methods. No priority should be given to horses raised for sport or competition without adequately covering all of the above - first. Shelter and housing are prioritized next, followed by mining and general industry/manufacturing. These are basic tenants of natural law and should be prioritized in order of "need" - not by the latest en vogue "sport" or "want" or even "business profitability." on Facebook Share Comment--We should look at all resources for self-sustainment inside the borders of Arizona without consideration for neighboring states or countries. - Arizona Water Law (AWL) and the follow-on promulgated rules & regulations require, first, an element of consistency throughout the Territory of Arizona. - Second, AWL - said (by water masters) to be the most "incongruous collection of special interest paragraphs" in Arizona Law - should require that "no man can be deprived of drinking water" with stiff penalties for violation. - After that, no person or entity upstream can dam or block water from downstream needs (water shed management regulation needed). - All promulgated rules & regulations regarding water use and distribution should be managed according to guidelines within the "USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map - U.S. Department of Agriculture" (GZ) designations. The northern parts of the territory are in GZ-6 and GZ-7. The southern part is predominately in GZ-8. - From that point, food is the next most important priority behind water. What edible foods are grown in GZ-6 & 7? What edible foods are grown in GZ-8? What edible foods need the most water on a "per-acre" calculation for (a) human and (b) animal nutritional benefits? Flora pollinators & cross-pollinators for sustaining life and abundant growth must necessarily be managed - not on men's whims - but on science's calculated facts. Animal breeds are essential factors in food production. For example - the Jornada Experimental Range northeast of Las Cruces (Growing Zone "8") established in 1912, found in general terms, that the Brangus breed of cattle is far more efficient than, say, Herefords or pure Brahman herds on a grazing site monitored over a sixty (60) year period by "cow-unit-per-acre" and "carcass size" suitable for majority slaughterhouse meat processors. Based upon sufficient study, water-use law should be measured by "best conservation" and "highest quality need." - Water use is not a sport. - Consider switching back to the "community swimming pool" rather than have individual pools of water evaporating at accelerated rates. It's the same for unnecessary personal fish ponds. Neither is in the community's best interest until all other basic needs herein are satisfied. Then, if enough water is deemed available, by all means, fill up your personal swimming pool if you must. In arid lands, WATER must take top priority over all other matters except border security and community safety, followed by the general health and welfare of citizens within the territory. Until other laws related to, for example, eating horse meat are changed, horses contribute little or nothing other than for use in antiquated farming/plowing methods. No priority should be given to horses raised for sport or competition without adequately covering all of the above - first. Shelter and housing are prioritized next, followed by mining and general industry/manufacturing. These are basic tenants of natural law and should be prioritized in order of "need" - not by the latest en vogue "sport" or "want" or even "business profitability." on Twitter Share Comment--We should look at all resources for self-sustainment inside the borders of Arizona without consideration for neighboring states or countries. - Arizona Water Law (AWL) and the follow-on promulgated rules & regulations require, first, an element of consistency throughout the Territory of Arizona. - Second, AWL - said (by water masters) to be the most "incongruous collection of special interest paragraphs" in Arizona Law - should require that "no man can be deprived of drinking water" with stiff penalties for violation. - After that, no person or entity upstream can dam or block water from downstream needs (water shed management regulation needed). - All promulgated rules & regulations regarding water use and distribution should be managed according to guidelines within the "USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map - U.S. Department of Agriculture" (GZ) designations. The northern parts of the territory are in GZ-6 and GZ-7. The southern part is predominately in GZ-8. - From that point, food is the next most important priority behind water. What edible foods are grown in GZ-6 & 7? What edible foods are grown in GZ-8? What edible foods need the most water on a "per-acre" calculation for (a) human and (b) animal nutritional benefits? Flora pollinators & cross-pollinators for sustaining life and abundant growth must necessarily be managed - not on men's whims - but on science's calculated facts. Animal breeds are essential factors in food production. For example - the Jornada Experimental Range northeast of Las Cruces (Growing Zone "8") established in 1912, found in general terms, that the Brangus breed of cattle is far more efficient than, say, Herefords or pure Brahman herds on a grazing site monitored over a sixty (60) year period by "cow-unit-per-acre" and "carcass size" suitable for majority slaughterhouse meat processors. Based upon sufficient study, water-use law should be measured by "best conservation" and "highest quality need." - Water use is not a sport. - Consider switching back to the "community swimming pool" rather than have individual pools of water evaporating at accelerated rates. It's the same for unnecessary personal fish ponds. Neither is in the community's best interest until all other basic needs herein are satisfied. Then, if enough water is deemed available, by all means, fill up your personal swimming pool if you must. In arid lands, WATER must take top priority over all other matters except border security and community safety, followed by the general health and welfare of citizens within the territory. Until other laws related to, for example, eating horse meat are changed, horses contribute little or nothing other than for use in antiquated farming/plowing methods. No priority should be given to horses raised for sport or competition without adequately covering all of the above - first. Shelter and housing are prioritized next, followed by mining and general industry/manufacturing. These are basic tenants of natural law and should be prioritized in order of "need" - not by the latest en vogue "sport" or "want" or even "business profitability." on Linkedin Email Comment--We should look at all resources for self-sustainment inside the borders of Arizona without consideration for neighboring states or countries. - Arizona Water Law (AWL) and the follow-on promulgated rules & regulations require, first, an element of consistency throughout the Territory of Arizona. - Second, AWL - said (by water masters) to be the most "incongruous collection of special interest paragraphs" in Arizona Law - should require that "no man can be deprived of drinking water" with stiff penalties for violation. - After that, no person or entity upstream can dam or block water from downstream needs (water shed management regulation needed). - All promulgated rules & regulations regarding water use and distribution should be managed according to guidelines within the "USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map - U.S. Department of Agriculture" (GZ) designations. The northern parts of the territory are in GZ-6 and GZ-7. The southern part is predominately in GZ-8. - From that point, food is the next most important priority behind water. What edible foods are grown in GZ-6 & 7? What edible foods are grown in GZ-8? What edible foods need the most water on a "per-acre" calculation for (a) human and (b) animal nutritional benefits? Flora pollinators & cross-pollinators for sustaining life and abundant growth must necessarily be managed - not on men's whims - but on science's calculated facts. Animal breeds are essential factors in food production. For example - the Jornada Experimental Range northeast of Las Cruces (Growing Zone "8") established in 1912, found in general terms, that the Brangus breed of cattle is far more efficient than, say, Herefords or pure Brahman herds on a grazing site monitored over a sixty (60) year period by "cow-unit-per-acre" and "carcass size" suitable for majority slaughterhouse meat processors. Based upon sufficient study, water-use law should be measured by "best conservation" and "highest quality need." - Water use is not a sport. - Consider switching back to the "community swimming pool" rather than have individual pools of water evaporating at accelerated rates. It's the same for unnecessary personal fish ponds. Neither is in the community's best interest until all other basic needs herein are satisfied. Then, if enough water is deemed available, by all means, fill up your personal swimming pool if you must. In arid lands, WATER must take top priority over all other matters except border security and community safety, followed by the general health and welfare of citizens within the territory. Until other laws related to, for example, eating horse meat are changed, horses contribute little or nothing other than for use in antiquated farming/plowing methods. No priority should be given to horses raised for sport or competition without adequately covering all of the above - first. Shelter and housing are prioritized next, followed by mining and general industry/manufacturing. These are basic tenants of natural law and should be prioritized in order of "need" - not by the latest en vogue "sport" or "want" or even "business profitability." link

    Comment--We should look at all resources for self-sustainment inside the borders of Arizona without consideration for neighboring states or countries. - Arizona Water Law (AWL) and the follow-on promulgated rules & regulations require, first, an element of consistency throughout the Territory of Arizona. - Second, AWL - said (by water masters) to be the most "incongruous collection of special interest paragraphs" in Arizona Law - should require that "no man can be deprived of drinking water" with stiff penalties for violation. - After that, no person or entity upstream can dam or block water from downstream needs (water shed management regulation needed). - All promulgated rules & regulations regarding water use and distribution should be managed according to guidelines within the "USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map - U.S. Department of Agriculture" (GZ) designations. The northern parts of the territory are in GZ-6 and GZ-7. The southern part is predominately in GZ-8. - From that point, food is the next most important priority behind water. What edible foods are grown in GZ-6 & 7? What edible foods are grown in GZ-8? What edible foods need the most water on a "per-acre" calculation for (a) human and (b) animal nutritional benefits? Flora pollinators & cross-pollinators for sustaining life and abundant growth must necessarily be managed - not on men's whims - but on science's calculated facts. Animal breeds are essential factors in food production. For example - the Jornada Experimental Range northeast of Las Cruces (Growing Zone "8") established in 1912, found in general terms, that the Brangus breed of cattle is far more efficient than, say, Herefords or pure Brahman herds on a grazing site monitored over a sixty (60) year period by "cow-unit-per-acre" and "carcass size" suitable for majority slaughterhouse meat processors. Based upon sufficient study, water-use law should be measured by "best conservation" and "highest quality need." - Water use is not a sport. - Consider switching back to the "community swimming pool" rather than have individual pools of water evaporating at accelerated rates. It's the same for unnecessary personal fish ponds. Neither is in the community's best interest until all other basic needs herein are satisfied. Then, if enough water is deemed available, by all means, fill up your personal swimming pool if you must. In arid lands, WATER must take top priority over all other matters except border security and community safety, followed by the general health and welfare of citizens within the territory. Until other laws related to, for example, eating horse meat are changed, horses contribute little or nothing other than for use in antiquated farming/plowing methods. No priority should be given to horses raised for sport or competition without adequately covering all of the above - first. Shelter and housing are prioritized next, followed by mining and general industry/manufacturing. These are basic tenants of natural law and should be prioritized in order of "need" - not by the latest en vogue "sport" or "want" or even "business profitability."

    Vic Currier asked 11 months ago

    Thank you for your response. Your comments suggest the need for a structured, science-based approach to water and resource management in Arizona that is both comprehensive and strategic. We will further consider your comments as we draft this plan.

  • Share Stop big Ag from using up all our water. on Facebook Share Stop big Ag from using up all our water. on Twitter Share Stop big Ag from using up all our water. on Linkedin Email Stop big Ag from using up all our water. link

    Stop big Ag from using up all our water.

    Raber asked 11 months ago

    Thank you for your comment.

  • Share All these people in the Sulpher Springs valley, demanding water restrictions do not speak for those of us in the San Pedro Valley. on Facebook Share All these people in the Sulpher Springs valley, demanding water restrictions do not speak for those of us in the San Pedro Valley. on Twitter Share All these people in the Sulpher Springs valley, demanding water restrictions do not speak for those of us in the San Pedro Valley. on Linkedin Email All these people in the Sulpher Springs valley, demanding water restrictions do not speak for those of us in the San Pedro Valley. link

    All these people in the Sulpher Springs valley, demanding water restrictions do not speak for those of us in the San Pedro Valley.

    1971kris asked 12 months ago

    Understood, thank you for your comment.

  • Share 1. Why have we not yet shifted to 3d printing "atmospheric water generators" (look up the technology at the EPA site and general searches) - "water from air" towers and devices, hydropanels, as a way to reduce the drain on our aquifer? 2. Greenhouse farming uses a lot less water than traditional farming. Why are we still using ancient farming pratices that consume a lot of water in our climate emergency when we have so many better options? For those who prefer outdoor farming, something like the Tree T-Pee on individual plants could also help slow or stop the drain on our aquifer too. 3. What do I have to do to get the County to go to the Feds to get the Rucker Canyon Dam repaired? It would make a great back up water source for when wells run dry, like they are. There is a product called Hydreva, a magnetic water cleaner, can make the water from there drinkable. Divine solutions to our water problems are everywhere! How do we incorporate them into our plans for the future as well as the present too? on Facebook Share 1. Why have we not yet shifted to 3d printing "atmospheric water generators" (look up the technology at the EPA site and general searches) - "water from air" towers and devices, hydropanels, as a way to reduce the drain on our aquifer? 2. Greenhouse farming uses a lot less water than traditional farming. Why are we still using ancient farming pratices that consume a lot of water in our climate emergency when we have so many better options? For those who prefer outdoor farming, something like the Tree T-Pee on individual plants could also help slow or stop the drain on our aquifer too. 3. What do I have to do to get the County to go to the Feds to get the Rucker Canyon Dam repaired? It would make a great back up water source for when wells run dry, like they are. There is a product called Hydreva, a magnetic water cleaner, can make the water from there drinkable. Divine solutions to our water problems are everywhere! How do we incorporate them into our plans for the future as well as the present too? on Twitter Share 1. Why have we not yet shifted to 3d printing "atmospheric water generators" (look up the technology at the EPA site and general searches) - "water from air" towers and devices, hydropanels, as a way to reduce the drain on our aquifer? 2. Greenhouse farming uses a lot less water than traditional farming. Why are we still using ancient farming pratices that consume a lot of water in our climate emergency when we have so many better options? For those who prefer outdoor farming, something like the Tree T-Pee on individual plants could also help slow or stop the drain on our aquifer too. 3. What do I have to do to get the County to go to the Feds to get the Rucker Canyon Dam repaired? It would make a great back up water source for when wells run dry, like they are. There is a product called Hydreva, a magnetic water cleaner, can make the water from there drinkable. Divine solutions to our water problems are everywhere! How do we incorporate them into our plans for the future as well as the present too? on Linkedin Email 1. Why have we not yet shifted to 3d printing "atmospheric water generators" (look up the technology at the EPA site and general searches) - "water from air" towers and devices, hydropanels, as a way to reduce the drain on our aquifer? 2. Greenhouse farming uses a lot less water than traditional farming. Why are we still using ancient farming pratices that consume a lot of water in our climate emergency when we have so many better options? For those who prefer outdoor farming, something like the Tree T-Pee on individual plants could also help slow or stop the drain on our aquifer too. 3. What do I have to do to get the County to go to the Feds to get the Rucker Canyon Dam repaired? It would make a great back up water source for when wells run dry, like they are. There is a product called Hydreva, a magnetic water cleaner, can make the water from there drinkable. Divine solutions to our water problems are everywhere! How do we incorporate them into our plans for the future as well as the present too? link

    1. Why have we not yet shifted to 3d printing "atmospheric water generators" (look up the technology at the EPA site and general searches) - "water from air" towers and devices, hydropanels, as a way to reduce the drain on our aquifer? 2. Greenhouse farming uses a lot less water than traditional farming. Why are we still using ancient farming pratices that consume a lot of water in our climate emergency when we have so many better options? For those who prefer outdoor farming, something like the Tree T-Pee on individual plants could also help slow or stop the drain on our aquifer too. 3. What do I have to do to get the County to go to the Feds to get the Rucker Canyon Dam repaired? It would make a great back up water source for when wells run dry, like they are. There is a product called Hydreva, a magnetic water cleaner, can make the water from there drinkable. Divine solutions to our water problems are everywhere! How do we incorporate them into our plans for the future as well as the present too?

    Nayer asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your comments. You have mentioned several innovative technologies and sustainable practices that could help mitigate water scarcity and enhance agricultural efficiency. Each of these deserve consideration.

  • Share How do we reclaim the land and water resource currently under the control of the federal government, i.e. the Rucker Canyon Dam, for We The People? We can 3d+ print the repairs with a veterans based crew and use part of the area as a modern Ellis Island style relocation service to help with the many climate crisis refugees already arriving. We don't have to wait to 2045 to begin. Let that be our completion date. on Facebook Share How do we reclaim the land and water resource currently under the control of the federal government, i.e. the Rucker Canyon Dam, for We The People? We can 3d+ print the repairs with a veterans based crew and use part of the area as a modern Ellis Island style relocation service to help with the many climate crisis refugees already arriving. We don't have to wait to 2045 to begin. Let that be our completion date. on Twitter Share How do we reclaim the land and water resource currently under the control of the federal government, i.e. the Rucker Canyon Dam, for We The People? We can 3d+ print the repairs with a veterans based crew and use part of the area as a modern Ellis Island style relocation service to help with the many climate crisis refugees already arriving. We don't have to wait to 2045 to begin. Let that be our completion date. on Linkedin Email How do we reclaim the land and water resource currently under the control of the federal government, i.e. the Rucker Canyon Dam, for We The People? We can 3d+ print the repairs with a veterans based crew and use part of the area as a modern Ellis Island style relocation service to help with the many climate crisis refugees already arriving. We don't have to wait to 2045 to begin. Let that be our completion date. link

    How do we reclaim the land and water resource currently under the control of the federal government, i.e. the Rucker Canyon Dam, for We The People? We can 3d+ print the repairs with a veterans based crew and use part of the area as a modern Ellis Island style relocation service to help with the many climate crisis refugees already arriving. We don't have to wait to 2045 to begin. Let that be our completion date.

    Nayer asked about 1 year ago

    To provide some context for others, Rucker Canyon Dam is managed by the U.S. Forest Service as part of the Coronado National Forest. In recent years, there have been some discussions about rebuilding or repairing the dam to enhance its economic/environmental/and community benefits and we are aware of at least one petition on change.org specifically related to this dam. Thank you for bringing this up.

Page last updated: 01 Dec 2025, 01:25 PM